Comparison between monte carlo simulation codes for emulsion chambers

K. Yanagisawa, K. Yoshida, Y. Komori, T. Kobayashi, J. Nishimura

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Abstract

Cosmic-ray electron observations in the energy range from 30 GeV to 3 TeV have been performed by using balloon-borne emulsion chambers. The emulsion chamber is an excellent imaging detector with a high position resolution of 1µm. This imaging capability enables the emulsion chamber to identify electrons against gamma rays and protons, determine electron energies, and be a thin and low mass detector. The performance of the emulsion chamber was examined by Monte Carlo simulations of Geant4 and EPICS with the results of accelerator beam tests of electrons in 50 GeV – 250 GeV at CERN-SPS. In order to evaluate the possible systematic differences, especially at energies greater than 250 GeV, we made a comparison between completely different simulation codes of Geant4 and EPICS. As the results, we confirmed that the systematic differences are 1 – 3 % for the integral track lengths, which are sufficiently-small for the energy determinations with the emulsion chambers.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProceedings of the 33rd International Cosmic Rays Conference, ICRC 2013
PublisherSociedade Brasileira de Fisica
ISBN (Electronic)9788589064293
Publication statusPublished - 2013 Jan 1
Event33rd International Cosmic Rays Conference, ICRC 2013 - Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
Duration: 2013 Jul 22013 Jul 9

Publication series

NameProceedings of the 33rd International Cosmic Rays Conference, ICRC 2013
Volume2013-October

Other

Other33rd International Cosmic Rays Conference, ICRC 2013
Country/TerritoryBrazil
CityRio de Janeiro
Period13/7/213/7/9

Keywords

  • EPICS
  • Electron
  • Emulsion chamber
  • Geant4
  • Mont-Carlo simulation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison between monte carlo simulation codes for emulsion chambers'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this