Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Corrigendum: The credibility challenge for global fluvial flood risk analysis (Environmental Research Letters (2016) 11 (094014) DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/11/9/094014/meta)

  • M. A. Trigg
  • , C. E. Birch
  • , J. C. Neal
  • , P. D. Bates
  • , A. Smith
  • , C. C. Sampson
  • , D. Yamazaki
  • , Y. Hirabayashi
  • , F. Pappenberger
  • , E. Dutra
  • , P. J. Ward
  • , H. C. Winsemius
  • , P. Salamon
  • , F. Dottori
  • , R. Rudari
  • , M. S. Kappes
  • , A. L. Simpson
  • , G. Hadzilacos
  • , T. J. Fewtrell

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debatepeer-review

Abstract

The formula in the article for Model Agreement Index is incorrect. It has an extra N in the denominator that should not be there. The correct formulae for the Model Agreement Index is shown below. MAI = σi=2 Ni/N ai/A The analyses presented in the paper were conducted with the correct formula.

Original languageEnglish
Article number099503
JournalEnvironmental Research Letters
Volume13
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018 Sept 10
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
  • General Environmental Science
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Corrigendum: The credibility challenge for global fluvial flood risk analysis (Environmental Research Letters (2016) 11 (094014) DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/11/9/094014/meta)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this