A multicriteria analytical framework for sustainability evaluation under methodological uncertainties

Joel Opon, Michael Henry

研究成果: Article査読

16 被引用数 (Scopus)


Multicriteria analysis is widely used to perform sustainability evaluation for purposes such as decision making or progress assessment following a chosen sustainable development concept. The stages of multicriteria analysis include indicator selection, data characterization, normalization, weighting, and aggregation. However, due to the various framings of sustainability, non-equivalent approaches could be adopted at each stage, introducing methodological uncertainty. Consequently, depending on the methods chosen, divergent and conflicting conclusions or decisions may result. This paper addresses the issue of methodological uncertainties in sustainability evaluation by analyzing how methodological uncertainties arise during multicriteria analysis, then proposing an analytical framework that employs uncertainty and sensitivity analyses to quantify and manage the effects of methodological uncertainties. The consideration of methodological uncertainties in the structure of multicriteria sustainability evaluation shifts the analysis from deterministic to probabilistic, which is advantageous to arrive at robust and homogenized sustainability conclusions or decisions.

ジャーナルEnvironmental Impact Assessment Review
出版ステータスPublished - 2020 7月

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • 地理、計画および開発
  • 生態学
  • 管理、モニタリング、政策と法律


「A multicriteria analytical framework for sustainability evaluation under methodological uncertainties」の研究トピックを掘り下げます。これらがまとまってユニークなフィンガープリントを構成します。