TY - CHAP
T1 - Blood-device interaction
AU - Simmonds, Michael J.
AU - Watanabe, Nobuo
AU - Nandakumar, Deepika
AU - Horobin, Jarod
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
PY - 2018
Y1 - 2018
N2 - Management of organ failure has improved in recent years in parallel with advancements in interventions, including organ transplant, although the shortage of donor organs remains the rate-limiting step. The advent of mechanical alternatives to biological organs is a burgeoning area available to clinicians in a variety of scenarios, including short-term procedures (e.g., cardiopulmonary bypass), longer and acute management (e.g., extracorporeal membrane oxygenation), and semi-to-permanent therapies (e.g., ventricular assist devices). A paradigm shift has recently effected a transition from "bridge" therapies toward destination therapies, with a resultant increase in clinical utilization. It is clear, however, that while mechanical circulatory and respiratory support devices can sustain life, damage to blood and its constituents, and/or activation of cellular processes, can negatively impact recovery and health. These adverse effects may be broadly related to blood exposure to high shear stress and/or interactions between biological and artificial materials. Only through advances in mechanical circulatory and respiratory support to minimize blood damage will complications be overcome and mechanical devices attain their true potential.
AB - Management of organ failure has improved in recent years in parallel with advancements in interventions, including organ transplant, although the shortage of donor organs remains the rate-limiting step. The advent of mechanical alternatives to biological organs is a burgeoning area available to clinicians in a variety of scenarios, including short-term procedures (e.g., cardiopulmonary bypass), longer and acute management (e.g., extracorporeal membrane oxygenation), and semi-to-permanent therapies (e.g., ventricular assist devices). A paradigm shift has recently effected a transition from "bridge" therapies toward destination therapies, with a resultant increase in clinical utilization. It is clear, however, that while mechanical circulatory and respiratory support devices can sustain life, damage to blood and its constituents, and/or activation of cellular processes, can negatively impact recovery and health. These adverse effects may be broadly related to blood exposure to high shear stress and/or interactions between biological and artificial materials. Only through advances in mechanical circulatory and respiratory support to minimize blood damage will complications be overcome and mechanical devices attain their true potential.
KW - Blood compatibility
KW - Blood damage
KW - Blood rheology
KW - Erythrocytes
KW - Platelets
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85053337389&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85053337389&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/B978-0-12-810491-0.00019-9
DO - 10.1016/B978-0-12-810491-0.00019-9
M3 - Chapter
AN - SCOPUS:85053337389
SN - 9780128104910
SP - 597
EP - 626
BT - Mechanical Circulatory and Respiratory Support
PB - Elsevier Inc.
ER -