TY - GEN
T1 - Examination of evaluation method on human error during work by bioinstrumentation
AU - Kishimoto, Taro
AU - Yoshida, Reiji
AU - Tobe, Yoshito
AU - Sugaya, Midori
N1 - Funding Information:
We would like to thank Nahoko Takada and Yukinori Katagiri of Hitachi, Ltd. for their insight and expertise that greatly assisted the research. We would also like to thank our laboratory members for participating in the experiment.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 IEEE.
PY - 2019/9
Y1 - 2019/9
N2 - In recent years, mechanisms to detect and correct human errors by AI and efforts to automate business operations have been advancing. Human errors are expected to be fatal in the future, and they need to be predicted and prevented in advance. Researches has also been proposed to analyze human errors from a model of human behavior and electroencephalograms, but no other useful biological information is considered. Therefore, in this research, we thought that prediction and detection could be performed by adding autonomic nerves that can be acquired from heart rate as biological information and observing patterns before and after mistakes. In order to realize it, we measured the pulse and EEG of the worker who is carrying out the computational task, developed an experimental system to investigate the question and timing of the task, assumed that it that it is possible to evaluate the electroencephalogram and pulse at the time of human error occurrence by the computational task. In addition, a questionnaire based on NASA Task Load Index was conducted to enable analysis using subjective assessment of the tasks. Through the evaluation experiments, it was suggested that it is possible to detect the occurrence of human error in the group that answered that emphasized a particular measure in the questionnaire.
AB - In recent years, mechanisms to detect and correct human errors by AI and efforts to automate business operations have been advancing. Human errors are expected to be fatal in the future, and they need to be predicted and prevented in advance. Researches has also been proposed to analyze human errors from a model of human behavior and electroencephalograms, but no other useful biological information is considered. Therefore, in this research, we thought that prediction and detection could be performed by adding autonomic nerves that can be acquired from heart rate as biological information and observing patterns before and after mistakes. In order to realize it, we measured the pulse and EEG of the worker who is carrying out the computational task, developed an experimental system to investigate the question and timing of the task, assumed that it that it is possible to evaluate the electroencephalogram and pulse at the time of human error occurrence by the computational task. In addition, a questionnaire based on NASA Task Load Index was conducted to enable analysis using subjective assessment of the tasks. Through the evaluation experiments, it was suggested that it is possible to detect the occurrence of human error in the group that answered that emphasized a particular measure in the questionnaire.
KW - Bioinstrumentation
KW - Biological-Information
KW - Human-Error
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85077996038&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85077996038&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1109/REW.2019.00019
DO - 10.1109/REW.2019.00019
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85077996038
T3 - Proceedings - 2019 IEEE 27th International Requirements Engineering Conference Workshops, REW 2019
SP - 92
EP - 95
BT - Proceedings - 2019 IEEE 27th International Requirements Engineering Conference Workshops, REW 2019
PB - Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
T2 - 27th IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference Workshops, REW 2019
Y2 - 23 September 2019 through 27 September 2019
ER -